GCOMS logo
United Kingdom

Global Campaign on Military Spending UK

Cut Military Spending - Fund Human Needs

  • About GDAMS UK
    • Supporting Organisations
    • GCOMS International
  • Days of Action April 2018
    • Vote for a Safer World
    • Top tips for planning actions
    • Churches and faith communities
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Campaigning resources
    • Articles and Reports
  • Contact

Austerity hypocrisy: military spending is spared the chop

6th August 2013

The links between austerity and arms trade spending are complicated and – sadly – plentiful. The links were expanded on in the recent New Internationalist magazine’s July-August 2013 issue on debt.

New Internationalist July-August 2013

While bailout conditions impose austerity on debt-stricken southern European economies, demands to tighten the belt on military spending are not so vocal.

According to a recent report from the Transnational Institute (TNI), the German government, while demanding social cuts, has been lobbying behind the scenes against cuts to military spending in countries such as Greece, because of concerns for its own arms industry and the debts it’s owed. Where cuts to military spending are being made, it’s mostly to personnel and wages – not what the TNI calls ‘toys for the boys’.

An aide to former Greek Prime Minister, George Papandreou, has reportedly said: ‘No-one is saying “Buy our warships or we won’t bail you out”. But the clear implication is that they will be more supportive if we do.’

Arms manufacturers based in the large EU economies, although feeling increased competition, still see a boom in profits thanks to the continued spending. European leaders such as David Cameron and François Hollande have becoming travelling salespeople for their arms industries, promoting to countries with questionable human rights records.

Read more details, as well as the rest of the issue, in New Internationalist.

Comments

  1. Jennifer Symonds says

    29th January 2014 at 08:52

    ‘Twas ever thus: killing people is probaly cheaper in the long run for gvts as then money isn’t needed for welfare & overseas aid!!!! (Anyway since when have gvts ever really cared about the poor & anyone in real need?)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

  • Online vote for 2018 launched – vote now! 3rd April 2018
  • New campaign postcard for 2018 15th March 2018
  • New handbook for GCOMS 1st March 2018

Events

  • No events planned - check back later.
  • More...

GCOMS on Facebook

GCOMS on Facebook

GCOMS on Twitter

My Tweets
Arms to Renewables

Let's shift priorities to create better jobs and a safer world. Sign up!

All content licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise stated. This site uses cookies.